LEGAL PROCESS DOCS
RAIL IS WRONG FOR US
TODs are absurd
ALTERNATIVES TO RAIL
October 3, 2017
Here's another chapter of "Getting Around":
Three months ago I released the Introduction and the first chapter of Getting Around: a history of how we move around in American cites. Chapter I is,"The Growth of Public Transportation, 1827-1923," Chapter II is, "The Automotive Revolution to 1923," and it is now ready. Further chapters will be released from time to time when finished. Chapter III will be "The Roller Coaster Years, 1923-1946.
I would appreciate it if you would share this with others who have an interest in the subject, particularly with anyone who has any knowledge of the period covered in the first two chapters covering the period 1827 to 1923, not necessarily just about public transportation.
September 14, 2017
Another reason why rail fails:
One of our favorite quotes is that from the late UCLA Economics and Transportation Professor George Hilton who in classing rail transit as what eocomists call "inferior goods" once wrote:
"An increase of one percent in family income will typically reduce the family's use of rail passenger service by 0.6 percent. Thus, rail passenger trains provide an inferior service with respect to income, analogous to potatoes, farinaceous foods, and other inferior goods, consumption of which decreases with increments in income."
Hilton, George W. Rail Transit and the Pattern of Modern Cities: The California Case. Traffic Quarterly. July 1967. p. 388.
August 20, 2017
Great column on rail by Shapiro today:
Today's column in the Star Advertiser by David Shapiro is well thought advice for the legislature on why they must wait for the results of the HART audit before approving any future funding for rail. Read it here.
August 17, 2017
Our comments on the City Auditor's remarks:
Honolulu's City Auditor Edwin Young is a recipient of the national Association of Government Accountants' Distinguished Local Government Leadership Award so it is with some trepidation that I comment on his reported remarks in this morning's Star Advertiser.
Mr. Young says that if Mr. Grabauskas were still in office he would call for a forensic audit. That begs the question, why did Mr. Young not call for such an audit when Mr. Grabauskas was in office? Has Mr. Young discovered something subsequent to the audit he performed that changed his mind? Second, if there "red flags" as Mr. Young avers, then others at HART must have been involved in the "red flags," so why is a forensic audit still not essential?
July 22, 2017
Randal O'Toole reports on declining national transit ridership:
Today, New Geography published this commentary by Randal O'Toole on declining ridership at transit agencies across the nation. Here's an excerpt from it:
"...several major transit agencies lost 25 to 35 percent of their riders between 2009 and 2016, and most of these continued to lose in 2017. Moreover, none of the factors that led to these declines–low fuel prices, high auto ownership rates, rising costs, increasing competition from ride-hailing services–are going away, and some are only going to get worse.
Since 1970s, the transit industry has received well over a trillion dollars in subsidies while seeing a 20 percent drop in the average number of rides urban resident take each year. All this should lead Congress and state legislatures to question why taxpayers ought to continue subsidizing this fast declining industry. "
July 21, 2017
Wednesday's Star Advertiser Editorial — Do the forensic Audit:
When the Star Advertiser editorial board is critical of the Honolulu rail project, no matter how mildly, it is what may be reasonably termed, an earth shattering event. So when they call for HART to rethink their cancellation of the forensic audit that had been championed by HART Board Member John Henry Felix, we believe you can be assured that the audit will be reinstated. Here's the editorial.
July 19, 2017
HART Board Meeting at Kapolei tomorrow July 20 at 9:00 am:
Given the release of the John Henry Felix letter (see below) and the discovery of the whistle-blowing letter of former HART employee, Bart Desai, to then HART Chair Coleen Hanabusa, this should make for an interesting meeting.
Cliff and Bobbie Slater will both be there and would welcome company to either testify or just be there.
The meeting will be in Kapolei Hale, Conference Room B, 1000 Uluohia St, at 9:00AM.
If you would like to testify, you can register online at firstname.lastname@example.org
NEWS! John Henry Felix launches a bombshell:
Two days ago respected civic and business leader John Henry Felix sent a detailed three-page letter to his fellow HART Directors that is utterly scathing of every aspect of the HART rail project from its original design, the projections, the construction and its funding. It is such a powerful letter that it must be read in the original.
July 9, 2017
U.S. Public Transportation, 1823-1972:
The Introduction and Chapter I, "The Growth of Public Transportation, 1827-1923," of my book on the history of U.S. public transportation is now ready in draft form for historians and knowledgeable lay people to critique. Further chapters have been written in rough and the draft versions will be uploaded as time permits. They will have the following titles:
Chapter Two The Automotive Revolution to 1923
Chapter Three The Watershed Years, The 1920s
Chapter Four The Roller Coaster Years, 1930 – 1946
Chapter Five Collapse and Rebirth, 1946-1972
I would appreciate it if you would share this, particularly with anyone who has knowledge of the period covered in the first chapter, 1827 to 1923, not necessarily just about public transportation.
July 4, 2017
Here's some reasons why the HART Board does not want to do a forensic audit:
In the latest issue of Hawaii Free Press,they write, "We are reprinting excerpts from an April 23 letter to Honolulu Councilmember Ann Kobayashi from Honolulu Attorney John C. McLaren who wrote “on behalf of former Governor Ben Cayetano and other unidentified people” according to the May 6 Advertiser.
McClaren then lists a number of allegedly flagrant violations of the law including the following:
"The most egregious an example is InfraConsult, LLC (“InfraConsult”) (formed by three former Parsons Brinckerhoff employees) that was awarded a contract for Project Management Support Services for the Honolulu High Capacity Corridor Project in the amount of $36,727,162.00 from a Short List listing only InfraConsult and no other persons.
"The InfraConsult contract was awarded on November 19, 2009 and the award was posted the following day on the State & County Professional Service Awards website. This appears to be an exceptionally short time period in which InfraConsult had to:
"unless InfraConsult knew well in advance of November 19, 2009 that it was assured of receiving this award, and it had also completed virtually all of these steps before the award was announced."
Further details at Hawaii Free Press at this location.
SA today has a wonderfully fun article by Marjorie Morgan on rail:
Marjorie Morgan, a retired City employee, has written a piece about the what the rail will mean to you and your family if you intend to make it family-centered. Useful to give to pro-rail people who think they are going to use it. Well worth the read.
July 3, 2017
July 2, 2017
Reuters: Tokyo taxi firm plans self-driving taxis for 2020 Olympics:
Hinomaur Kotsu Company of Tokyo is planning a venture with Japan's robotics company ZMP Inc. to have fully automated taxi service in place for the 2020 Olympics. The full story is here.
Today's Star-Advertiser column by David Shapiro:
His column is titled, "Rail-oriented development wreck can still be prevented." He writes, "It’s little surprise now that a project budgeted at $5.2 billion has ballooned to $10 billion and growing. You get the same sinking feeling today that something is seriously amiss with rail’s conjugal partner — transit-oriented development.
He goes on to discuss the how the TOD (aka Transit Operated for Developers) legislation has been misused by developers. It is worth the read.
June 30, 2017
Are you confused about the status of the $250,000 HART special audit?
We were. So, we asked HART what the status was. Their reply: "It would be correct to say that the Board of Directors of the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation adopted a budget that includes $250,000 for special audit services should the Board determine other audit services be needed for a scope of work to be determined. This budget is for the fiscal year that begins July 1, 2017. As such, the answer to your second question would be no, the audit has not been cancelled."
That really did not seem to settle the question so we went back to the transcript of the discussion's in the HART Board Meeting. Here are the relevant excerpts:
Ember Shinn, HART Board Member: "And my last question has to do with the $250,000 for the special audit. And it’s less of a question and more of a comment about that. I understand that the board put this in the budget in November when it approved the budget, and I would just ask that before that money is spent, assuming it’s not going to be spent for the mandatory audits that you have to do, you know, your regular financial audits, but whatever the special audit, whether it’s a forensic or something else, that the board has an opportunity to discuss, debate and determine whether or not it’s a wise use of funds, given the fact that when the board put this in the budget in November, we did not have the APTA (American Public Transportation Association) peer review, and I thought we weren’t getting the regular reports from PMOC Jacobs (Project Management Oversight Contractor)."
"And so, as a new member of the board, it’s not my intent to muck around in the past, and try to figure out what we did wrong in the past, it’s more trying to get forward, and trying to make sure that we’re spending appropriately, and we’re cost -- doing very cost conscience decisions, and we’re monitoring everything going forward. And what I like about the APTA peer review as well as the PMOC reports, is that it primarily talks about management and process, as opposed to saying, ‘We made a screwy stupid decision back then.’ And I think going forward, that’s what I would like to do, unless there’s some critical issue where we suspect there’s like fraud or embezzlement or something like that, that really does need that type of an audit. As I said, I’d rather not spend the money and use it in another way that would be moving the process forward."
Wes Frysztacki, HART Board Member: "I can’t resist, I need to jump in again. I would like to see your comment number two, or your question number two linked with your question number four, because part of my difficulty is I have no budget whatsoever to look at what needs to be done to make the transition to comply with charter amendment number four. So rather than them spending the $250,000 in looking at the past, and then wondering what we do about it -- maybe we’ve already fixed the things that would be uncovered -- and I think we have actually -- I would like to ask the board to think about doing the things that you said, let’s sit back and kinda look at this budget item. Given what the council said, I think we have discretion to change that and use it for something positive. So I will make that request at the right time. I don’t know whether -- is this the right time right now to perhaps make that request?"
Krishniah N. Murthy, Interim Exec. Dir. & CEO, HART: "Can I request the chair? Please give us an opportunity, to, since we are in the process of doing some restructuring of the organization to fit into the upcoming projects that we have to handle and the financial issues that we need to deal with, so I think we may need some assistance from outside. The specialty type of individuals or firms to do some type of audit type of work for each group that we have within HART. So I would like to come up with a proposal to the board to consider using part of that $250,000 to do those things.
Summary: It is fairly obvious that these folks don't want to be looking under any damp rocks in case they find evidence of a level of incompetence that might lead the public to believe that the $10 billion would not be enough to finish rail and might cost the $13 billion, or more, that Dr. Prevedouros believes is the likely outcome.
Note that DTS Head Wes Frysztacki said, "I think we have discretion to change that and use it for something positive." Which is to say, nothing negative here folks, move along there's nothing to see. Frysztacki, as head of DTS, would be the rail line's operator and has a vested interest to see that this line gets built no matter what it costs.
Considering that there are $billions at stake, a $250,000 forensic audit is pocket change. The whole purpose of an audit, such as this, is to correct the mistakes that people have been making to get $5 billion in the hole so that you don't keep making the same mistakes and get another $5 billion in the hole. You can read the HART response and the transcript here.
June 29, 2017
Randy Roth's 3-minute video summation of the rail situation:
Here is Randy's wonderful summary of the rail situation as it is now, given to the City Council on June 22, 2017. It only takes three minutes but tells you what you need to know to oppose the rail project. View it here
June 28, 2017
A Trip Down Memory Lane with a word from Don Horner:
This video reminds us all of the delusional views of the political establishment about the projected rail transit project where, in their view, the costs were way overstated so we did not have to worry about cost overruns and, after all, this was all about a Quality of Life issue.
This was a talk given by Don Horner when on February 10, 2010 Mayor Mufi Hannemann hosted a rail transit public meeting update "Jobs, The Economy, And Our Island's Future." The public meeting included discussion with U.S. Senator Dan Inouye's chief of staff, Jennifer Goto-Sabas, First Hawaiian Bank board chairman and Hawai'i Business Roundtable executive committee member Don Horner, and American Institute of Architects member Shaun Ushijima.”
Autonomous vehicles coming earlier than thought:
The forecasts for when self-driving cars will be a significant factor in commuting have just moved up a notch. Here are a few excerpts (and the link) from a report on new research by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG),one of the most prestigious of U.S. consulting shops:
“Convergence of three trends, ride sharing, autonomous driving, and vehicle electrification, will offer big-city dwellers cheap, convenient transportation, transforming the automotive industry,” says BCG.
“by 2030, around a quarter of all miles driven in the US could be in shared autonomous electric vehicles, which will offer consumers in large cities the lowest-cost, most convenient form of transportation.”
“Cities will benefit from less congestion and cleaner air, but could be disadvantaged by falling ridership on public transit, fear of which could result in some cities proactively trying to regulate the number of SAEVs [shared autonomous electric vehicles] on the road.”
“The shift to SAEVs, which would be gradual and would begin by the early 2020s, would likely occur in cities with more than 1 million people, where there is sufficient demand to keep fleet utilization high and there are significant pain points associated with private vehicle ownership (expensive insurance, difficulty finding parking, and congestion).”
“Adoption could be even faster and more widespread if innovations in technology and pricing models reduce costs further for consumers. Innovations could include radically different vehicle designs (such as driverless pods), new tailored services (such as pooled ride sharing), and new revenue streams (such as in-vehicle advertising). At a lower price point, SAEV service might be attractive in more mid-size cities (with populations of 500,000 to 1 million).”
“The age of shared autonomous electric vehicles is upon us and now is the time for automakers, suppliers, and cities to begin taking the bold steps necessary to thrive in this rapidly changing world,” said Justin Rose, a Chicago-based partner who leads BCG’s digital efforts for industrial goods companies. “Companies need to deconstruct and rebuild business models, develop new capabilities, create new sources of sustainable advantage, and shift assets and talent to new purposes—or risk becoming irrelevant. As with any great disruption, this transition will be risky and extremely challenging, particularly in the face of near-term investor expectations of customer demands.”
Note that BCG is warning cities that this disruption is nearly upon us. It will make much of public transit obsolete. Labor costs for both maintenance and drivers of public transit are presently 70 percent of total costs. Under the BCG scenario drivers will disappear and electric vehicles will have half the maintenance costs of regular vehicles. Their place will be taken by SAEVs.
June 25, 2017
At City Council Professor Roth slays ''em on GE Tax vs. Property Tax:
At a recent City Council hearing on taxes for rail, Professor Roth had a set to with Councilmember Ikaika Anderson over the issue of whether taxpayers should pay for rail with property taxes or GE Taxes. Professor Roth was making the point that if either tax raised the same amount of money then taxpayers were paying the same amount. Anderson was not having it. Either he did not understand how the GE Tax works, or he pretended not to. It was an interesting encounter available here.
June 24, 2017
We have completely updated our cost-disbenefit analysis of rail:
You read it right,disbenefit. There are no benefits whatsoever to building the rail project. With all the changes that have occurred in the last four years since our last update our handout was due for an update. The handout is two pages designed to be printed back and front, for a single page handout. It covers all the major topics such as understated costs, overstated ridership, why it would be an environmental disaster, why it will use far more energy than cars, let alone buses, and summarizes the "dumb or dumber" argument about stopping the rail project.
We suggest you download it, print it both sides and use it on your pro-rail friends and elected officials. Download here.
June 23, 2017
Our definitive statement on the overstated rail ridership:
It can be downloaded here:
HNN -- "Rail critics say rider projections inflated, transparency lacks with HART board":
Hawaii News Now's Rick Daysog covered yesterday's HART Board Meeting where Randy Roth and Cliff Slater argued for more transparency in HART's public outreach efforts. You can see elements of it live on HNN and Rick Daysog's reportage.
Read below for some of the material Roth and Slater tried to cover by during the hearing but were prevented from doing so by Wes Frystacki, who is both the head of the Department of Transportation Services and one of the preparers of the rail project's Final EIS.
June 10, 2017
Here is what you need to know about rail:
First is that rail only promises the miniscule advantage of reducing auto traffic by 1.7 percent; it will not be noticeable.
That 1.7 percent will happen only if they have the rail ridership, and there is no chance of that. Half the ridership will reduce the traffic improvement to less than one percent.
It will use more energy per passenger mile than we do now, whether by automobile or bus.
It will have a bad effect on road traffic due to the supporting columns taking up road space. Think for a moment of eight-foot diameter pillars (the width of a city bus) along Halekauwila Street.
Go to our handout for a little more detail and if you really want to get into the weeds, try our tabs to the left.
When you get down to working out all the options open to us to remedy the current rail situation it all comes down to the “Dumb and dumber” solution, which Randy Roth and I wrote about in Civil Beat recently. It is really a dumb idea to just stop rail where it is. On the other hand, it is even dumber to spend another $9 billion to get it to Ala Moana Center (it doesn’t even open until the rush hour has passed). All to get a less than one percent decrease in traffic, which is worsening one percent a year due to population growth.
Dumb or dumber — take your choice.
Here is what you have to do about rail:
The City Council vote last week for the issuing of bonds for rail construction was 6-3 against us. In early 1992 we also lost a City Council vote on rail by that amount. But, by having large numbers of constituents contact their Councilmembers, we wore down our opposition and gained two more votes. We beat rail on September 22 of that year with a 5-4 vote in our favor.
It was a success we can repeat.
To do so, there are two actions you must take immediately:
1. Call your Councilmember (check who that is in the list below). If you can’t speak to someone or leave a voice message, send them an email. In all cases, it is important that you include your name and address so that they can check that you really are a constituent of theirs. Consider saying or writing something like this, firm but not abusive, and in your own words:
“I am fed up with the out of control spending on rail. Don’t vote again for any rail taxes if you want my support. I am a constituent of yours, [Your name], [your address] [your zip code]”
2. On your Facebook page, write the following, but in your own words:
The City Council can still stop rail; only two more Council members need to change their votes. They need to know that their constituents are opposed to the Council raising taxes or borrowing any more money for rail. Go to www.honolulutraffic.com, learn more about the current rail situation and find out what you can do about it.
Generations now and yet to come will thank you for this effort.
List of City Council Members
June 10, 2017
Civil Beat: "The impending Honolulu Rail Ridership Debacle":
This late posting is of an article by Cliff Slater and Randy Roth that ran in Civil Beat in February this year.
It makes the case that there is no way that City can make its ridership projections. First, you have to know that the average shortfall on rail transit ridership projections is 40 percent according to the FTA's own studies. Second, we show that the City would have to cut their projections in half to bring it anywhere near that of other rail cities. The article makes it all clear together with sources of information. Ask us if you have any doubts about it.
April 27, 2017
A Simpson's episode -- "Marge vs. The Monorail":
Dave Rolf reminds us of the classic Simpsons episode about a town's citizens getting suckered into an elevated rail line by a "Music Man." Here's an excerpt from it: S /b>
April 27, 2017
Civil Beat: "Dumb and Dumber":
Today's Civil Beat carries an op/ed by Randy Roth and Cliff Slater wherein they make the case that there is one thing dumber than stopping the rail project dead in its tracks and that is to try to finish it. READ IT HERE.
April 21, 2017
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter now in the Star-Advertiser:
Their headline is "Cayetano asks Trump to ax Honolulu rail funds."
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter on KITV:
Their headline is "To Donald from Ben don't fund Honolulu's train"
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter on New Geography:
New Geography is a great website specializing in urban form and transportation issues.
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter on Civil Beat:
Their headline is "Cayetano To Trump: Cut Honolulu Rail Funds"
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter on Fox News:
You can see Malia Zimmerman's hand here on Fox News.
Governor Cayetano's "Dear President Trump" letter in Washington Post:
The full-page ad was published in this morning's Washington Post and is already creating a buzz both locally and in Washington. Read the ad here.
March, 22, 2017
Here's why rail is going to cost $12 to $13 billion:
The Mayor has told us that will take a total of $6.8 billion just to get to Middle Street and $9.5 to get to Ala Moana Center. The difference of $2.7 billion we are told will build the last five miles of the 20-mile line. The cost of the maintenance depot in the first 15 miles is roughly offset by the cost of the more stations per mile in the last five miles. That works out to be 28.4 percent of the money to build the last 25 percent of the line.
Bear in mind that this section is along crowded Dillingham Boulevard with major electrical utility problems, then Nimitz Highway, which is mostly fill land where each supporting pillar has to be itself supported by 3 to 5 others, and along Halekauwila Street, which is Ground Zero for 'iwi, the native Hawaiian burial sites.
You may also remember that this project started with a rock solid $5.3 billion projection cost. That has already been increased to $9.5 billion and we have not even got to the halfway point. You may also remember that we never predicted that the City would experience any cost overruns before they reached Dillingham Boulevard, the start of the Rail Quagmire, because doing the easy stuff first was why they were starting to build rail out in open fields.
You do not have to be a construction engineer to know that this last section is going to be far more costly than building in the empty fields at Ho'opili. So when Dr. Prevedouros tells us that we should be prepared for total construction costs of $12-$13 billion, you had better believe him.
March, 12, 2017
Ikaika Anderson "regrets"; like hell he does:
The late Honolulu City Council Chair Barbara Marshall must roll over in her grave when she hears the man she mentored, and who took over her council seat, Councilmember Ikaika Anderson, mouth off in today's Star Advertiser that, "We regret the situation in which we and our state colleagues find ourselves,” and then tells us we must finish it.
Like hell he does; he has enthusiastically pimped for rail since he was elected. It has not mattered that his constituents are opposed to rail and he can’t say he did not know what he was getting into. Here are Barbara Marshall’s thoughts on rail from a column written by Dan Boylan in 2007:
“I have this concern that we’ll start building the [rail] thing, run out of money, and have it end in an empty field somewhere. I’m also worried about the cost of maintaining a rail system. They’re expensive, and we’re already taxing our people to death.”
“I opposed the bill because I care about the people of the Leeward coast and Central Oahu,” she insists. “The proposed system isn’t going to give them any relief - not in the next 10 years or in the next 20 years. Even the mayor admits that it won’t ease congestion.” “But there are a myriad of things that we could do tomorrow that would ease congestion."
"Extend the zipper lane. Change the university’s hours at Manoa so that student traffic is not part of the rush hour crunch. Limit one lane of H-1 to buses only. Achieve greater traffic signal optimization. Build the university campus at West Oahu and support the development of businesses at Kapolei so that people who live out there can work out there. Stagger the work hours of city and state employees."
Barbara Marshall died on February 22, 2009, aged 64, after an eight-month battle with colon cancer. Marshall's husband, Cliff Ziems, endorsed her aide, Ikaika Anderson, to fill her city council seat; he was elected in a special election and was sworn into office on May 27, 2009. He has been voting for rail ever since. Where are his constituents?
March, 9, 2017
Civil Beat: "Honolulu rail: Too much; too late:
Civil Beat published this article today, which deals with why the Honolulu rail project will be totally obsolete not more than 15 years after they launch. Then we poor taxpayers have to come up with the funds to tear it down. It would be hilarious if it didn't costs so much, ruin the town's environment, and create traffic congestion when it get into town that you won't believe. Read the story here. Then if have any questions write to us at email@example.com.
February 6, 2017
Here's why we will only get half the rail ridership the City projects:
When you compare both the flaws in the City's ridership projection's for rail and the record of other rail cities in achieving their rail projections, it becomes clear what we would get in ridership. Here are the indicators: Real Ridership
January 22, 2017
Lest we forget -- the wasted environment is worth more than the wasted money:
The before and after view of the Honolulu waterfront, courtesy of the Hawaii Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, says about all there is to say about the rail's impact on the environment. Of course, you have to add the noise factor and the impact on traffic congestion of the 8' diameter pillars (the width of a city bus) stuck in the middle of Nimitz Highway.
January 17, 2017
Wall Street Journal says Trump should cut California's high speed rail funds:
The Wall Street Journal editorial board lists all the cost overruns and problems and then urges our new Transportation Secretary to yank the federal funding. They ask, "Why should national taxpayers pay for a boondoggle that California’s liberal legislators won’t?" Here's the link to WSJ today.
It's a good editorial but why did they leave us out?
January 16, 2017
Randy Roth's ThinkTech presentation:
Following is a link to a ThinkTech presentation of Randy Roth speaking on the rail situation. It would be most helpful if you would send it to all your friends and post it on your Facebook page.
October 31, 2016
Structural engineer Dennis Mitsunaga has ad in Sunday's SA:
In this full-page advertisement titled "Will the rail be safe to travel on?" in the Star Advertiser yesterday, Dennis Mitsunaga spells out his qualifications to discuss the structural defects of the rail project and then does so in 1,600 words. You will find it most interesting.
In the interest of making the piece more reader-friendly, we have taken the liberty of removing much of the capitalization and underlining.
October 30, 2016
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose:
The new CEO of HART, Mr. Krishniah Murthy, appears to be better qualified than anyone who has held that position before. Of course, that is not saying very much.
The problem as we see it is that Mr. Murthy is a 34 year veteran of Parsons Brinckerhoff, a fact which seems to have escaped Hawaii's major media. PB is the outfit that helped Mayor Hannemann get us into the difficulties we are experiencing today. Mr. Murthy worked for PB during Honolulu rail's formative period, 2004-2007. No one seems to have asked what involvement, if any, he had with the Honolulu project. What involvement did he have, if any, with the Boston project?
In addition, we have never been told what led to the replacement of PB by the less experienced company, CH2MHill. This was a billion dollar contract originally awarded to PB and yet they lost it with nary a whimper. Very strange.
As the French say, the more it changes, the more it is the same thing.
READ Mr. Murthy's bio.
October 6, 2016
CB: "What Do We Do Now About The Honolulu Rail Project?":
Panos Prevedouros, Cliff Slater and Randy Roth wrote this article for Civil Beat about the future of the rail project. Here is a short excerpt:
"The rational way to approach the rail question begins with three simple questions:
o How much more money would local taxpayers have to pay to construct and maintain a safe and reliable rail system?
o What would be the benefit of having such a system?
o What alternatives could be pursued if we were to stop rail now, and what would be the benefit of those alternatives? Honesty should be presumed only if the factual inquiry and decision-making processes are transparent so the public can see how the answers were reached." READ MORE
September 25, 2016
SA's Shapiro: "Rail is headed for the deep after a long, pricey journey":
David Shapiro writes a snippet on rail in his column this week, "Contractors who worked on Oahu rail say the project could end up costing more than $10 billion and take 15 more years to complete to Ala Moana. By the time it’s done, the last leg will be an Atlantis Submarine Adventure."
We wonder how many at the Star Advertiser feel the same way.
September 19, 2016
Hawaii Free Press today: "Feds: $540M in highway funds can be spent on rail":
Andrew Walden has written an excellent piece in today's Hawaii Free Press detailing how $540 million in Hawaii's Federal Highway funds could be made available to bail out the rail project.
Dr. Prevedouros concurred with that commenting, "The article is accurate. HDOT [Hawaii Department of Transportation] does not want to divert funds for rail but if Governor Ige agrees with Mayor Caldwell and asks, then highway funds can be programmed to assist with rail's road work."
Our view is that in one of the most lane-deficient states in the nation the last thing we should be doing is diverting funds from highways to rail.
September 18, 2016
S-A op/ed today: "It’s not too late to make right call on rail":
Professors Prevedouros and Roth have a great op/ed in today's Star Advertiser that makes you think through the unthinkable -- stopping the rail dead and turning into a park. You definitely need to READ MORE
S-A story today: Kiewit to lose $100 million on rail project?:
This is another interesting messmanagement story about rail for what it says about the construction labor market and what it says about construction cost forecasting for both HART and Kiewit.
We don't see how either one could not have seen this tight labor market coming. These enormous condos sprouting up in Kaka'ako took a great deal of time to plan and get the necessary zoning changes, all of which is a matter of public record. Kiewit could at least rest easy that they could make it up in change orders but they may have misjudged, as the story discusses, the quality of labor you get when bottom feeding. READ MORE
September 17, 2016
Why rail to Ala Moana will cost at least $11 billion:
HART says they can build to Middle Street for $6.22 billion while the Mayor implies that it might be a stretch to get to Middle Street for the $6.8 billion in available funding. HART’s total projected cost to get to Ala Moana Center is $8.1 million.
In either case, they are not allowing enough for the final five-mile segment to Ala Moana. If the Mayor is right and it takes $6.8 billion to get to Middle Street that leaves only $1.3 billion to finish it.
However, this final segment is certainly the most challenging one because,
1. It has eight stations, 38 percent of the 21 stations.
2. It has the costly separation of electrical utilities from the rail line, which they have not yet even projected the costs, let alone actually dealt with the reality of it.
3. It will have to deal with a mile and a half of fill land in those places formerly makai of the old waterfront.
4. It will face heavy concentrations of ‘iwi once it gets into Halekauwila Street.
5. They have to cope with tight urban spaces and they have not had to contend with that so far.
Given all the problems in the final segment it is more likely the final 25 percent of the rail line length to Ala Moana Center will be 35 to 40 percent of the total costs. In that case the total costs would around $11 billion.
Our long-time followers will remember that we never forecast any cost overruns before rail got to Dillingham Boulevard but once we started down Dillingham we thought the costs would morph out of sight; it would be a cost quicksand.
It is obvious to everyone but HART that this puppy will go a lot further north than $8.1 billion. We like the Feds “upper bound” of $10.9. Panos Prevedouros would like to add another billion to that.
September 9, 2016
Finally: A rail project that is worse than ours:
The California High Speed Rail Project (CHSRP) the controversial high-speed rail system that is supposed to connect California's two largest cities, Los Angeles and San Francisco, via trains running 220 miles an hour is vying for the dubious honor of being the worst rail project in the nation. We thought we had it in the bag but no more. This Weekly Standard article tells in great detail how this project is affecting the residents who live along the route. There are great similarities, cost overruns, enormous cost and an out of control semi-autonomous agency running things.
Their latest problem is that the voters approved it on the basis that revenues would exceed operating costs. In other words pay for itself, other than construction costs. Then along comes the Los Angeles Times, which having filed a freedom-of-information request, revealed that their equivalent of HART had apparently scrubbed from its website a pessimistic assessment by the Spanish rail-construction contractor Ferrovial that the train would never be able to operate without the taxpayer subsidies that the voter-approved Proposition specifically forbids. The Spanish firm had noted in its bid that of 111 high-speed lines that it had looked at around the world, only 3 were financially viable without government aid. READ MORE
September 6, 2016
What is the ½ percent rail tax costing you each year?
Here's one way for you to know. It is to calculate what it would take in property taxes to fund rail for every year that the ½ GE tax surcharge would be in place.
Last year the rail tax collected $259 million, while total property tax collections were $894 million. If we were to substitute property tax for the ½ percent GE tax, we would need to collect the $894 billion plus the $259 million, or $1,153 million, which would require a 29 percent increase in the property tax you are now paying for the foreseeable future. Now calculate what a 29 percent increase in your property taxes would be. If your property taxes are now $2,500 annually, you would face a $725 increase.
It gives you some idea of the hidden effects are in the insidious General Excise tax and what it is really costing you. This is why the politicians avoid hiking property taxes and settle for the deceptive G.E. Tax.
By the way, tourists indirectly pay a considerable part of the property taxes in the hotel costs they pay; it is most probably the same 17 percent of property taxes that they pay in GE taxes. And all that is just for construction. Once rail begins operating you can add another $100 million annually.
September 4, 2016
Two good pieces in today's Star Advertiser:
A great column by David Shapiro, who concludes that:
"So after 10 years of deceit, mismanagement and failure, little has changed; Honolulu rail is being built on politics and melodrama instead of sound engineering and honest accounting.
"Cries to stay the course at any price carry a steep cost for the community.
"Our tax base is only so deep, and billions squandered on rail cost overruns are billions lost for addressing homelessness, massive pension debt, decaying infrastructure and climate change." READ MORE
Law Professor Randy Roth has an excellent letter in which he uses HART's own numbers to show that our lawsuit cost less than one-tenth of one percent of rail's projected cost. READ MORE
August 29, 2016
The case for stopping rail at the Middle Street Transit Center:
We were remiss in not posting this on May 19 when the Star Advertiser published it. Download it here.
August 18, 2016
HART CEO Dan Grabauskas quits:
We are sorry to see him go. He was a breath of fresh air compared with his predecessors; he lied far less. One of the definitions of lie as defined by the Free Dictionary is "something meant to deceive." The fact that HART often uses the slogan that rail will take 40,000 cars off he road is a deception meant to convince people that rail will have a major effect on traffic congestion. In fact, as you can see from the table below the 40,000 reduction is in the face of a 500,000 increase in car trips because of population growth. The 40,000 is only 1.4% of the total projected car trips; they will not be even noticed.
August 10, 2016
The purpose of our website and how to use it:
The function our website is to be useful to researchers rather than be part of social media. We have over 100GB of material that includes 40GB of FTA internal emails obtained as part of our lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu.
We have nearly all the legal documents relating to the lawsuit under the "Federal Courts" courts tab. All the state and federal guiding statutes and regulations are under "Process Docs" together with all the documents relating to the EIS process from start to finish.
At the foot of the column to the left is an archive of all the entries in this site since November 2004. The single red tab is a media record of the principal media stories 2003-2013.
One of the best ways to use the site is to perform a key word search in the search window combined with the adjacent radio button, "Honolulutraffic.com". You might be surprised at what results from such a search.
August 9, 2016
The Case for Stopping Rail Dead in its Tracks:
The question we have to ask ourselves is this: A majority of voters supported a $5.3 rail line in 2008. Now a majority oppose what looks like to be a $10 billion project. It appears that we could close out the project now for about a $3.5 billion loss. So the question is this, if you knew back then what you know now, a majority of us would have opposed the $5.3 billion rail project, so why on earth should be support spending $6.5 billion more to finish it. Read the story in full here.
July 31, 2016
Anti-rail group nominates City for FTA Award of Excellence:
Randy Roth, Cliff Slater, & Panos Prevedouros nominate the City of Honolulu (City) and Honolulu Authority Rapid Transportation (HART) for the following, barely believable feats:
1. Against all odds and at a time of record federal deficits and a slumping local economy, the City and HART somehow managed to extract and divert more than $5 billion in local funds (the upper range of which is still a mystery) and garner FTA support for $1.55 billion in federal funds – all to build an elevated heavy rail system that was out-of-date before construction even began (Antiquated Rail System)!
That's how it starts and to read the whole detailed two pages of the City's "incredible feats" read the pdf file.